Every claim is judged only by its evidence: data, method, logical consistency. It isn’t accepted because an institution, an expert or the majority says it. It isn’t rejected because it has been labelled a “conspiracy theory” or “pseudoscience,” or because someone controversial says it. Where the data aren’t enough, we say so: “unknown.”
What we do
We watch, read and test ideas: from old traditions, books, talks and modern teachers. We present them clearly, in our own words, so anyone can understand them without having seen the source. We are not researchers and we don’t write scientific papers. We write for anyone who wants to think.
What an article looks like
- The idea
- The main points, with examples from everyday life.
- The practices
- What you can try, when, and for how long.
- Our take
- Where we have something to add, or a reservation. Where we don’t, we leave it out.
- Inspiration
- Where the article started.
Our rules
What, not who
We care about what was said, not who said it. An idea isn’t right because someone famous says it, or wrong because someone unknown or controversial does. That’s why the source doesn’t appear in the text. We credit it at the end, as “Inspiration.”
Facts
We separate fact from idea. We state as fact only what can be checked, and we checked it. Ideas, beliefs and traditions we present as what they are. What the data contradict, we leave out. What can’t be judged, we call “unknown.”
Body
For practices that affect the body, such as fasting or breath-holding, we always say who should be careful and when to get a doctor’s advice.
Physics & Quantum
Quantum physics is one of the best-tested theories we have. What it means is not settled. So we keep the two apart: what has been measured we state as fact, interpretations as interpretations. In physics, the “observer” is the measurement, not necessarily a mind. Ideas like “consciousness shapes reality” we discuss openly, as ideas. And the word “quantum” proves nothing on its own.
Quotes
When we quote someone’s words directly, we give their name, the work and the year. Not to lean on their authority, but because the words are theirs. We check that they actually said it. If it can’t be confirmed, we write “attributed to,” or we don’t publish it.
Geopolitics
We look at every subject from at least two opposing sides. When we cite a source, we say where it comes from: state media, think tank, independent journalist. So you know, not so we can dismiss it. We don’t take party sides.